FDA Food Dye Phase-Out: What Changes for Shoppers in 2026

The FDA is phasing out petroleum-based food dyes, and major brands are reformulating. Here is which dyes are going, what natural alternatives are coming, and how to read labels now.

Jun 30, 2026|9 min read
By Sanket Patel|Updated 2026-06-30|6 sources|Editorial standards
FDA Food Dye Phase-Out: What Changes for Shoppers in 2026

Something has been changing in the cereal aisle. The colors look a little different. The ingredient lists are getting shorter. A few familiar products have disappeared from shelves entirely, replaced by reformulated versions with new color sources you might not recognize.

This is not an accident. It is the visible result of the largest overhaul of food coloring regulation in US history, one that began in April 2025 and is now moving through the food system product by product, brand by brand.

Which Dyes Are Being Eliminated

Which Dyes Are Being Eliminated

Nine petroleum-based synthetic dyes are being phased out of the US food supply. Together, they have colored everything from breakfast cereals and sports drinks to candy, medications, and processed cheese for decades.

The FDA announced in April 2025 that it would take the following actions:

  • FD&C Red No. 3 was revoked in January 2025, with a 2027 compliance deadline for food manufacturers. It is already gone from most products. Red 3 was approved for use in food despite being banned from cosmetics since 1990 over cancer concerns.
  • FD&C Red No. 40, Yellow No. 5, Yellow No. 6, Blue No. 1, Blue No. 2, and Green No. 3 are being phased out through voluntary industry commitments, with the FDA aiming for completion by end of 2027.
  • Orange B and Citrus Red No. 2 are being formally revoked through regulatory action.

These dyes are derived from petroleum and coal tar. They serve no nutritional purpose. Their sole function is to make food look more visually appealing, particularly to children.

Why Now

The health case against synthetic food dyes has been building for years. Research has linked several of these dyes to behavioral changes in children, particularly hyperactivity, and some animal studies have raised cancer concerns. The EU and Canada long required warning labels on foods containing certain synthetic colors, and California began restricting them in school foods in 2024.

What changed in 2025 was the political will to act at the federal level. Under the Make America Healthy Again initiative, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and FDA Commissioner Marty Makary made eliminating petroleum-based dyes a stated priority. Rather than waiting for new legislation, the administration worked with industry to secure voluntary commitments on a compressed timeline.

The consumer pressure was already there. Major retailers reported years of gradual progress reformulating products without synthetic colors before the federal announcement. The 2025 directive accelerated what was already happening.

Who Has Already Acted

The FDA's industry tracker shows a range of commitment dates. Several commitments are already complete.

CompanyProductsStatus
TargetAll cereal sold in stores and onlineComplete (May 2026)
Sam's ClubAll Member's Mark food and beverage productsComplete
Tyson FoodsJimmy Dean, Hillshire FarmComplete (May 2025)
Whole FoodsAll products (founding policy since 1980)Always been complete
Trader Joe'sAll productsAlways been complete
General MillsAll US cereals (Cheerios, Trix, Lucky Charms, Cinnamon Toast Crunch)In progress (Summer 2026)
WalmartAll Great Value, Marketside, Freshness private label foods + 30 other ingredientsIn progress (January 2027)
WK KelloggFroot Loops, Apple Jacks, Rice Krispies varietiesIn progress (End of 2027)
Campbell'sLance Crackers, V8 Splash, regional snack brandsIn progress (2026 fiscal year)
Conagra BrandsBirds Eye, Duncan Hines, Marie Callender's, Slim JimIn progress (End of 2027)

General Mills noted that 85% of its US retail portfolio was already free of synthetic dyes before the commitment was made. Target removed products from several brands that did not reformulate in time.

What Is Replacing Them

What Is Replacing Them

The natural alternatives now entering the food supply have been used in Europe and Canada for years. Most are derived from fruits, vegetables, and other plant sources.

For red and pink shades: Beet juice and beetroot red, hibiscus extract, anthocyanins from cherries and elderberries, and dragon fruit extract. The FDA approved beetroot red as a color additive in February 2026.

For yellow and orange shades: Beta-carotene from carrots and other plants, annatto extract from tropical tree seeds, turmeric, and saffron.

For blue and purple shades: Spirulina extract from algae (already used widely, with expanded approval in February 2026), butterfly pea flower extract, and grape skin extract.

For green shades: Chlorophyll from plants and algae, spirulina.

These sources have been used safely in food for generations, and most carry a profile that nutritionists consider lower risk than synthetic alternatives.

"Natural" Does Not Always Mean Risk-Free

One nuance that often gets lost in coverage of this transition: natural does not mean universally safe for everyone.

Kantha Shelke, a food scientist at Johns Hopkins University, told ABC News in June 2026 that two natural dyes deserve particular attention from sensitive consumers.

Carmine, also called cochineal extract or E120, is derived from crushed female cochineal insects and is widely used as a red dye in yogurts, candies, juices, and some processed meats. Our deep-dive on carmine covers all the product categories and label names where it appears. It can trigger allergic reactions ranging from hives to, in rare cases, anaphylaxis. People with shellfish allergies are sometimes (but not always) reactive to carmine. The FDA has required carmine and cochineal extract to be declared by name on food labels since 2011, specifically because of its allergy potential. Crucially, carmine is not vegan or vegetarian.

Annatto, a yellow-orange dye from the seeds of the Bixa orellana tree, is commonly used in cheeses, snack foods, and butter. It has been associated with cases of chronic urticaria (hives) in sensitive individuals, and some research suggests it may trigger reactions in people with aspirin sensitivity or salicylate intolerance.

Most other natural color alternatives, including beet juice, turmeric, spirulina, saffron, and grape skin extract, are considered low-risk for most people.

The transition away from petroleum-based dyes is a meaningful improvement for public health. But the new ingredient list still warrants reading, particularly for people with food allergies or specific sensitivities.

How to Read Labels During the Transition

How to Read Labels During the Transition

Products are reformulating on different timelines. This means that a product you bought last year may have a different formulation today, and a product that still contains FD&C dyes may be reformulated by next year.

A few practical steps for navigating this period:

Check the ingredient list, not the front of pack. A product marketed as "made with real fruit" or featuring nature imagery may still contain synthetic dyes. The ingredient list is the only reliable source. FD&C dyes will appear by their full name: FD&C Red No. 40, FD&C Yellow No. 5, FD&C Blue No. 1, and so on.

Know the difference between "no artificial colors" claims. As of February 2026, the FDA allows products containing natural dyes to carry a "no artificial colors" claim, even if those natural dyes were not present in earlier formulations. A product labeled "no artificial colors" may still contain carmine, annatto, or other natural dyes that are relevant for people with specific sensitivities.

Watch for carmine and annatto in reformulated products. These are among the most common replacements for Red 40 and Yellow 6, respectively. If you have shellfish allergies, are vegan, or have experienced reactions to natural colorings, carmine and annatto are worth checking explicitly.

Look for the label change itself. Some brands will explicitly note "new recipe" or "now made with natural colors" on reformulated products. Others will simply update the ingredient list without any front-of-pack notice.

What the State Bans Add

Federal action has been supplemented by state legislation. California banned Red 3 statewide (effective 2027) and prohibited six other commonly used dyes from school foods. West Virginia passed a broader ban covering all foods sold in the state, effective January 2028. Twenty-six additional states introduced relevant legislation in 2025 and early 2026.

For shoppers in these states, the timeline for reformulation may be accelerated for products sold locally. Manufacturers generally prefer uniform formulations across all markets rather than maintaining separate state-by-state product lines.

A Genuinely Positive Shift, With Caveats

The phase-out of petroleum-based food dyes is one of the clearest cases of a regulatory action with broad consumer benefit and minimal scientific controversy. These dyes serve no nutritional purpose. The evidence for potential harm, particularly in children, has been strong enough to prompt regulatory action in Europe and Canada for years before the US acted. The reformulated products that are already on shelves have been received positively by consumers.

The remaining questions are about pace, transparency, and the nuances of the natural replacements entering the supply chain.

IngrediCheck scans ingredient lists for FD&C dyes as well as natural color additives like carmine and annatto that carry their own allergy and dietary implications. As products reformulate through 2027, keeping a close eye on ingredient lists is the most reliable way to know exactly what is in the food you are buying.

Next Label Check

Follow the scanner, hub, and ingredient paths connected to this guide

Get the app for clearer label decisions.

Scan labels, see what fits your food notes, and read the why in plain English.

IngrediCheck app